<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Nicholas Hagen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs</link>
	<description>Tidbits and blogs from Nicholas Hagen related to software, web design, and usability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JSF: Suggestion for Performance Improvement by Youssouf</title>
		<link>http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/2009/05/01/jsf-suggestion-for-performance-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-51421</link>
		<dc:creator>Youssouf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/?p=132#comment-51421</guid>
		<description>Looks a lot like this article I saw by Hiren Dutta :

http://hirenscafe.blogspot.com/2010/03/jsf-application-tuning-webapp.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks a lot like this article I saw by Hiren Dutta :</p>
<p><a href="http://hirenscafe.blogspot.com/2010/03/jsf-application-tuning-webapp.html" rel="nofollow">http://hirenscafe.blogspot.com/2010/03/jsf-application-tuning-webapp.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Server vs Client-Side Rendering by Wladimir Tavares</title>
		<link>http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/2012/01/05/server-vs-client-side-rendering/comment-page-1/#comment-47810</link>
		<dc:creator>Wladimir Tavares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 04:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/?p=504#comment-47810</guid>
		<description>Same argument as on fat-client vs thin-client.

I prefer to have fat-clients. As they can do some processing that are currently been done on server&#039;s side, like rendering, formatting and other data conversion/modification. Thus offloading the server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same argument as on fat-client vs thin-client.</p>
<p>I prefer to have fat-clients. As they can do some processing that are currently been done on server&#8217;s side, like rendering, formatting and other data conversion/modification. Thus offloading the server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Ways to Skin a Fibonacci by Wladimir Tavares</title>
		<link>http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/2011/09/11/3-ways-to-skin-a-fibonacci/comment-page-1/#comment-47793</link>
		<dc:creator>Wladimir Tavares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/?p=490#comment-47793</guid>
		<description>Try O(n) sequential Fibonacci algo

public static long Fibonacci (long n) {
	long a = 0, b = 1, temp;

	while(n-- &gt; 0) {
		temp = a;
		a = b;
		b = temp + b;
	}
	return a;
}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try O(n) sequential Fibonacci algo</p>
<p>public static long Fibonacci (long n) {<br />
	long a = 0, b = 1, temp;</p>
<p>	while(n&#8211; &gt; 0) {<br />
		temp = a;<br />
		a = b;<br />
		b = temp + b;<br />
	}<br />
	return a;<br />
}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4 Reasons Samsung Should Buy WebOS by Bhawani Garg</title>
		<link>http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/2011/08/29/4-reasons-samsung-should-buy-webos/comment-page-1/#comment-46606</link>
		<dc:creator>Bhawani Garg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/?p=487#comment-46606</guid>
		<description>ya...100% correct ..and btw you write very well :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya&#8230;100% correct ..and btw you write very well :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alternatives to 3/4G Naming by Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/2011/12/16/alternatives-to-34g-naming/comment-page-1/#comment-45060</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/2011/12/16/alternatives-to-34g-naming/#comment-45060</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not confused, but it also made me do research to figure it all out - something the average consumer is not going to do.  Not only does 4G confuse people but LTE itself  is being deployed on multiple spectrums that are INCOMPATIBLE with each other.  So we still won&#039;t even be able to just buy a phone and switch carriers as we wish to get the best price.  I would not be surprised if in the next few years we start seeing more uproar about this as these companies continue to rip us off with their spectrum distinct LTE devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not confused, but it also made me do research to figure it all out &#8211; something the average consumer is not going to do.  Not only does 4G confuse people but LTE itself  is being deployed on multiple spectrums that are INCOMPATIBLE with each other.  So we still won&#8217;t even be able to just buy a phone and switch carriers as we wish to get the best price.  I would not be surprised if in the next few years we start seeing more uproar about this as these companies continue to rip us off with their spectrum distinct LTE devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alternatives to 3/4G Naming by Sujal</title>
		<link>http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/2011/12/16/alternatives-to-34g-naming/comment-page-1/#comment-45045</link>
		<dc:creator>Sujal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/2011/12/16/alternatives-to-34g-naming/#comment-45045</guid>
		<description>They *Want* people to be confused. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They *Want* people to be confused. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OneToOne with Hibernate by ashok</title>
		<link>http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/2009/10/07/onetoone-with-hibernate/comment-page-1/#comment-44822</link>
		<dc:creator>ashok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/?p=240#comment-44822</guid>
		<description>Other option which is not so clean would be to fake the one-to-one as one-to-many. At least avoids avoids extra selects for the related entity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other option which is not so clean would be to fake the one-to-one as one-to-many. At least avoids avoids extra selects for the related entity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OneToOne with Hibernate by ashok</title>
		<link>http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/2009/10/07/onetoone-with-hibernate/comment-page-1/#comment-44821</link>
		<dc:creator>ashok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/?p=240#comment-44821</guid>
		<description>Great article !! I had the same issue and wanted to verify online and found this issue.

I am wondering if hibernate should support some notion of cache to associate the primary key of the associated one-to-one relationship for an entity when the associated entity doesnt share the same primary key as parent entity. Something similar to what the second level cache does for one-to-many</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article !! I had the same issue and wanted to verify online and found this issue.</p>
<p>I am wondering if hibernate should support some notion of cache to associate the primary key of the associated one-to-one relationship for an entity when the associated entity doesnt share the same primary key as parent entity. Something similar to what the second level cache does for one-to-many</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Java: Understanding Generics, Type Erasure, and Bridge Methods by Bessie</title>
		<link>http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/2011/06/24/java-understanding-generics-type-erasure-and-bridge-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-42239</link>
		<dc:creator>Bessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/?p=436#comment-42239</guid>
		<description>? super Type is a lower bound
? extends Type is an upper bound

(See Mughal and Rasmussen &quot;A Programmer&#039;s Guide to Java SCJP Certification&quot;, p. 675)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>? super Type is a lower bound<br />
? extends Type is an upper bound</p>
<p>(See Mughal and Rasmussen &#8220;A Programmer&#8217;s Guide to Java SCJP Certification&#8221;, p. 675)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Netty: Using Handlers by Fernando Romero</title>
		<link>http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/2009/04/21/netty-using-handlers/comment-page-1/#comment-41283</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando Romero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.znetdevelopment.com/blogs/?p=107#comment-41283</guid>
		<description>MAny thanks for this tutorial. It&#039;s excellent and perfectly understandable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAny thanks for this tutorial. It&#8217;s excellent and perfectly understandable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

